Agent V1 vs V2 · Live Results

Two agents. Same strategy. Same thresholds. Only V2 uses UMIP. Period: 2026-02-21 to 2026-02-22

Agent V1

Fragmented wallets

Agent V2

UMIP vault

Fragmentation Events40
Missed Opportunities40
Opportunity Cost0.2192%0.0000%
Successful Executions21
Log Events245

UMIP Advantage

V2 eliminated 4 fragmentation events and saved 0.2192% cumulative opportunity cost vs V1.

4

fragmentation events eliminated

0.2192%

opportunity cost saved

Cumulative Fragmentation Events Over Time

V1 accumulates fragmentation; V2 stays at zero

Live Event Feed

Live
V2VAULT_OPEN14:16

Opened 50 USD long on GMX via UMIPVault. No fragmentation.

V1FRAGMENTATION18:59

Wanted gTrade, stuck on GMX. Lost 0.0548%/day

V1FRAGMENTATION18:58

Wanted gTrade, stuck on GMX. Lost 0.0548%/day

V1FRAGMENTATION18:58

Wanted gTrade, stuck on GMX. Lost 0.0548%/day

V1FRAGMENTATION18:55

Wanted gTrade, stuck on GMX. Lost 0.0548%/day

Opportunity Cost Calculator

Based on observed 0.2192% cumulative loss rate on Agent V1

$

Lost to fragmentation

$219.2

this period (V1)

With UMIP (V2)

$0.00

zero fragmentation

Annualized projection at current rate:

$80,008 lost/year without UMIP

Agent V1 — Fragmented

Separate wallets: GMX_USDC + GNS_USDC
Capital locked on wrong platform
Forced to trade suboptimal venue
Loses 0.2192% to fragmentation

Agent V2 — UMIP

Single UMIPVault holds all collateral
Routes to any platform in one call
Always targets the best rate
0.0000% opportunity cost

Want to run your own agent on UMIP?

Data from Arbitrum Sepolia · Updates every 60s